CORE DEFI PRIMITIVES AND MECHANICS

Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token Standards and Soulbound Tokens

10 min read
#DeFi #Smart Contracts #Token Standards #Blockchain Development #Soulbound Tokens
Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token Standards and Soulbound Tokens

In the last year I’ve walked a few long, rain‑slicked streets in Lisbon, coffee in hand, watching people huddle over their phones, eyes flicking between price charts and the next hot token launch. I couldn’t help but wonder: with so many new projects popping up, is it possible to build a DeFi ecosystem that lives for the long haul, that rewards thoughtful participation rather than flash‑sales? From ERC Tokens to SBTs Unlocking Utility in DeFi explores how the evolution from ERC‑20 to soulbound tokens can help create that endurance.

Let’s zoom out for a second. Think of a garden that has been tended with patience. The soil holds different nutrients, some parts are rich, some lean, and you decide where to plant the seeds, how much water each tree needs. A good portfolio works the same way. You don’t simply toss every idea into the field and hope; you map the terrain, choose what’s worth planting, and watch it grow over time.

That comparison becomes useful when we talk about the core building blocks of decentralized finance, the token standards that sit beneath the flashy interfaces and the newer idea of soulbound tokens that aim to tie digital assets to a person’s identity. Below I’ll walk through those primitives, what they truly mean, and how they can be harnessed to build ecosystems that are fair, transparent, and, above all, useful for real people like us.


Token Standards: The Contracts That Let Things Work

When you buy a piece of any Ethereum‑based asset, you’re dealing with an encoded contract that knows how to transfer value, how to maintain ownership, and how to keep everyone honest. There are a handful of standards that have become the de‑facto building blocks for any new token. DeFi Foundations: Token Standards and Soulbound Utility Explained provides a deeper dive into how these standards shape value flow.

ERC‑20 – The Currency Layer

ERC‑20 is the simple ledger that lets fungible tokens move from one account to another. Think of it like a spreadsheet that records every transfer, making sure the numbers always balance. A currency that is interchangeable—Bitcoin, USDC, any stablecoin—is essentially ERC‑20 in disguise.

If you’re building a DeFi lending protocol, your supply of reserves has to be ERC‑20 compliant so you can pool the funds, lend them out, and pull them back in later. It is the backbone of any fungible token ecosystem.

ERC‑721 – Ownership of One of a Kind

When you hold a piece of digital art that no one else has, you’re dealing with ERC‑721. Each token is unique, has its own metadata, and can be tracked individually. This is crucial for collectibles, game items, or any asset where scarcity matters.

The nuance here is that a given holder can own many ERC‑721 tokens, but each individual token is singular. The smart contract logic keeps track of each token’s owner, and transfers maintain that integrity.

ERC‑1155 – A Unified Shelf

ERC‑1155 is an attempt to bring the best of both worlds. A single contract can store many different types of tokens: fungible ERC‑20 items, ERC‑721 collectibles, or even semi‑fungible items that have a quantity but also some unique properties. That reduces gas costs and simplifies the front‑end for users.

If you are creating a platform that offers both wrapped fiat and unique NFTs, ERC‑1155 lets you keep those all in one place, making it easier for the user to see their entire “portfolio” on a single screen.


Building Core DeFi Primitives

When we talk about DeFi primitives, we mean the small, reliable building blocks that can be combined to create complex financial services. Think of them as the wood, nails, and glue that bring a garden plot to life. Below are the primitives we rely on most heavily.

1. Liquidity Pools

At the heart of any exchange, lending platform, or yield aggregator is a liquidity pool. By pooling assets, we can provide automated market making (AMM) or stablecoin swaps without needing a central order book.

  • Uniswap‑style pools use a constant product formula; liquidity providers deposit equal‑value pairs and earn fees that grow as trades occur.
  • Stable‑coin pools (like Curve) use algorithms that keep the basket’s value stable, offering lower slippage and yield for participants.

Liquidity pools give you the space to trade, lend, or borrow, but they also bring impermanent loss and concentration risk. Those are not hidden—they’re on the contract’s surface.

2. Yield Aggregators

When you provide liquidity, you might feel compelled to chase the biggest returns. Yield aggregators attempt to find the highest net yield by moving funds between pools, lending protocols, or lending to DeFi protocols that distribute rewards.

Examples include Yearn.finance and Harvest. They are essentially robo‑advisors, but instead of portfolio allocation, they allocate you into the best liquidity or lending slot at a given time.

The key point: they expose a single interface for complex movement while keeping you insulated from each protocol’s complexity. This is a core concept that ties back to the mechanics discussed in Core DeFi Mechanics: Token Standards and the Rise of Soulbound Utility.

3. Staking Mechanisms

Staking locks your tokens to support network security; the reward comes from securing the blockchain’s future. Whether it’s Ethereum 2.0 or Solana, staking is a basic yet powerful primitive.

In a DeFi scenario, users often stake tokens to get voting power or governance rights, or to earn a share of protocol revenue. Some protocols even support meta‑staking where you can stake tokens that are behind other protocols (e.g., you stake a wrapped BTC and get a share of the mining pool).

4. Governance Tokens

When people own tokens that let them vote, the token’s primary function becomes not just currency but a voting power. DAO governance tokens drive protocol upgrades, fee structures, or treasury changes.

A crucial lesson here is: voting power is a responsibility; it comes with a risk of mis‑management. Protocols that decentralise decision‑making often rely on community engagement and transparent discussion to prevent a single actor from hijacking the network.


Soulbound Tokens: A New Kind of Digital Record

Now, let’s focus on the star of the show: soulbound tokens (SBTs). The idea is simple yet powerful—tokens that are non‑transferable: once you own them, they stay bound to your address. That may sound like a limitation, but it unlocks a new form of identity, reputation, and trust.

Why Non‑Transferability Matters

In a world where anything can be bought or sold, the concept that a piece of data belongs unequivocally to a person adds weight to that data. Think of it as proof that you completed a course, earned a certification, or have a certain standing in a community. Without the option to trade, other users can rely on the authenticity and permanence of that proof.

SBTs are being explored for academic credentials, professional certifications, gaming achievements, or even decentralized governance badges.

Use Cases in DeFi

  1. KYC‑Alternative Credentials
    Currently, many DeFi platforms require some form of Know‑Your‑Customer compliance. That usually feels intrusive. If you hold an SBT proving you passed an “Ethereum Security Course” or were accredited by a reputable community, you could get faster onboarding without revealing personal details.

  2. Reputation Signals
    When lending to someone in a peer‑to‑peer protocol, you’d want to gauge the borrower’s trustworthiness. An SBT stating a borrower had a long‑term staking record can serve as solid collateral for the protocol’s risk assessment.

  3. Governance Enhancers
    Governance protocols may want to reward only holders of certain skill‑based or participation‑based SBTs. That would ensure only participants with a proven track record influence changes.

Risk and Mitigation

  • Replayability: If an SBT is easily minted by a dishonest party, it can break the trust system.
  • Privacy: Though SBTs are non‑transferable, they still exist on the blockchain. That visibility needs to be handled carefully.

Proper design involves using zero‑knowledge proofs or selective disclosure methods so that only the intended attribute is visible to a verifier.


Putting It All Together: A Real‑World DeFi Pathway

Let’s walk through a concrete example—an open‑source DeFi ecosystem built on Binance Smart Chain (BSC) that wants to support both yield farming and a non‑fungible ecosystem of “certified” traders.

Step 1 – Decide Your Token Standards

  • Primary Token (BSC‑BUSD): ERC‑20 to be used as the base currency for trading and lending.
  • Cert Token (BSC‑CRED): ERC‑1155, holding multiple types:
    • ERC‑1155 “level‑up” tokens that are fungible, e.g., BUSD‑stakes.
    • ERC‑1155 “badge” non‑fungible tokens that are SBTs representing certifications.

Step 2 – Deploy Liquid Pools

Build a standard Uniswap‑V2 style pair for BUSD/BSC‑BUSD for users to swap, and a Curve‑style pool for BUSD/BSC‑CRED to facilitate stable swap rates among the tokens. This provides the primary liquidity primitives.

Step 3 – Launch Yield Aggregator

Set up a Yearn‑style aggregator that moves user funds among the BUSD pool and a lending protocol (e.g., Venus on BSC). Users can stake BUSD in the aggregator to earn yield, with the aggregator automatically balancing between high-yield pools.

Step 4 – Introduce Soulbound Credentials

When a user completes a risk‑assessment quiz or a coding challenge in the ecosystem, the system mints an SBT “BSC‑CRED‑Risk‑Trainee” that is non‑transferable and stored in the user’s wallet.

This SBT can be used by the aggregator to assign a discount on protocol fees for the user, promoting responsible participation.

Step 5 – Governance Layer

Only users that hold at least one “BSC‑CRED‑Governance‑Member” SBT can submit proposals. This restricts governance to vetted participants, lowering the risk of spam or malicious moves.


Reflecting on the Big Picture

When we build an ecosystem built on the primitives of token standards and enriched with SBTs, we’re essentially designing a living garden. Each token standard handles a specific function: fungible tokens for everyday transactions, NFTs for uniqueness, and SBTs for identity. Our DeFi primitives (liquidity, yield, staking) are the water, fertilizers, and sun.

Emotional check‑in: There’s often a fear that building on the blockchain is too technical. It’s valid. But when you disassemble the system into digestible pieces—standards that give clarity, primitives that are proven—the path forward looks less daunting.

A gentle reminder: Markets test patience before rewarding it. A token or protocol that starts with a good foundation won’t win overnight; it will grow like a well‑tended garden.


Practical Takeaway for You

  1. Start small – Pick one token standard (ERC‑20 for currency, ERC‑1155 for flexible mixing) and build a simple liquidity pair.
  2. Layer responsibly – Add yield aggregation later, only once you are comfortable auditing the underlying smart contracts.
  3. Add identity where it matters – Issue an SBT only when it can genuinely influence user experience (KYC alternative, reputation badge).
  4. Govern with intention – Anchor voting power to vetted credentials; avoid leaving critical decisions open to any wallet holder.
  5. Keep learning – Read the docs of each standard, watch the community discussions, and practice writing test contracts. Knowledge is the best soil for any garden.

I hope this walkthrough feels less like a dense technical manual and more like a shared walk through the market garden I love to step into every morning. If you have questions or ideas about specific components—SBT design, liquidity strategy, or governance—I’m a coffee cup away. Let’s keep the conversation going.

Lucas Tanaka
Written by

Lucas Tanaka

Lucas is a data-driven DeFi analyst focused on algorithmic trading and smart contract automation. His background in quantitative finance helps him bridge complex crypto mechanics with practical insights for builders, investors, and enthusiasts alike.

Discussion (9)

MA
Marco 5 months ago
I'm skeptical that SBTs can really change the game. People still chase charts. The article feels a bit too optimistic. Anyone else feel that way?
AL
Alexei 5 months ago
Marco, I think SBTs might be the missing piece for lasting engagement. They tie reputation to utility. Sure, there are still hype tokens, but the underlying mechanics help.
LI
Liam 5 months ago
Nice article. I like the breakdown of ERC standards. But I worry about scaling SBTs. How do you handle gas costs on a busy network?
AU
Aurelia 5 months ago
Liam, scaling has been tackled in layer2s lately. They offer cheaper tx so SBTs can roam. Still need adoption. I'm looking at a project that merges SBTs with staking rewards.
LI
Liam 5 months ago
True. Staking rewards give users a reason to hold SBTs. That could keep them from flipping.
SA
Sarah 5 months ago
I read the article and I think the core primitives are overhyped. Tokenomics is still the same problem. The best we have are liquidity pools that reward liquidity providers.
LU
Luigi 5 months ago
Sarah, do you consider that SBTs could legitimize certain governance roles? It might reduce the number of malicious actors.
MA
Maria 5 months ago
Sure, Luigi. If only the project cements identity proofs, governance would be more secure. But we still have the issue of privacy.
DM
Dmitry 5 months ago
Honestly, this is just another buzz. I think we miss the point. Token standards evolve; SBTs are just another token type. It's a chicken and egg problem.
KE
Kevin 5 months ago
Marco, I got your point but think of it as moving from a single token to a full identity layer. It's like moving from email to multi-factor auth. Long-term security may increase.
MA
Marco 5 months ago
Kevin, agreed about auth but I'm not sure SBTs will be used beyond collectibles. People still buy them for status, not utility.
GA
Gaius 5 months ago
Kevin made a fair point. In my project, we use SBTs to track learning courses. People need proof of completion for jobs. That looks promising.
KE
Kevin 5 months ago
Exactly, Gaius. It goes beyond status. If you think about professional accreditation, that might be how SBTs thrive.
EM
Emma 5 months ago
Sarah, I think the biggest challenge is user education. Even if SBTs exist, people need to understand what they are. That’s the real hurdle.
EM
Emma 5 months ago
Exactly. We should build out guides that explain the difference between fungible, non‑fungible, and soulbound tokens.

Join the Discussion

Contents

Emma Sarah, I think the biggest challenge is user education. Even if SBTs exist, people need to understand what they are. Tha... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 22, 2025 |
Gaius Kevin made a fair point. In my project, we use SBTs to track learning courses. People need proof of completion for jobs.... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 20, 2025 |
Kevin Marco, I got your point but think of it as moving from a single token to a full identity layer. It's like moving from em... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 18, 2025 |
Dmitry Honestly, this is just another buzz. I think we miss the point. Token standards evolve; SBTs are just another token type... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 15, 2025 |
Luigi Sarah, do you consider that SBTs could legitimize certain governance roles? It might reduce the number of malicious acto... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 12, 2025 |
Sarah I read the article and I think the core primitives are overhyped. Tokenomics is still the same problem. The best we have... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 10, 2025 |
Aurelia Liam, scaling has been tackled in layer2s lately. They offer cheaper tx so SBTs can roam. Still need adoption. I'm looki... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 07, 2025 |
Liam Nice article. I like the breakdown of ERC standards. But I worry about scaling SBTs. How do you handle gas costs on a bu... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 05, 2025 |
Marco I'm skeptical that SBTs can really change the game. People still chase charts. The article feels a bit too optimistic. A... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 02, 2025 |
Emma Sarah, I think the biggest challenge is user education. Even if SBTs exist, people need to understand what they are. Tha... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 22, 2025 |
Gaius Kevin made a fair point. In my project, we use SBTs to track learning courses. People need proof of completion for jobs.... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 20, 2025 |
Kevin Marco, I got your point but think of it as moving from a single token to a full identity layer. It's like moving from em... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 18, 2025 |
Dmitry Honestly, this is just another buzz. I think we miss the point. Token standards evolve; SBTs are just another token type... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 15, 2025 |
Luigi Sarah, do you consider that SBTs could legitimize certain governance roles? It might reduce the number of malicious acto... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 12, 2025 |
Sarah I read the article and I think the core primitives are overhyped. Tokenomics is still the same problem. The best we have... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 10, 2025 |
Aurelia Liam, scaling has been tackled in layer2s lately. They offer cheaper tx so SBTs can roam. Still need adoption. I'm looki... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 07, 2025 |
Liam Nice article. I like the breakdown of ERC standards. But I worry about scaling SBTs. How do you handle gas costs on a bu... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 05, 2025 |
Marco I'm skeptical that SBTs can really change the game. People still chase charts. The article feels a bit too optimistic. A... on Building DeFi with Core Primitives Token... May 02, 2025 |