Terms of Use

Last updated: October 25, 2025

Terms and Conditions ("Terms")

Last updated: October 23, 2025

Please read these Terms and Conditions ("Terms", "Terms and Conditions") carefully before using the definomist.com website (the "Service") operated by Definomist ("us", "we", or "our").

Your access to and use of the Service is conditioned on your acceptance of and compliance with these Terms. These Terms apply to all visitors, users, and others who access or use the Service. By accessing or using the Service you agree to be bound by these Terms. If you disagree with any part of the terms, then you may not access the Service.

THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT PROVIDE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, LEGAL, OR TAX ADVICE. ALL INFORMATION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.

1. The Non-Financial Advice Disclaimer (Crucial Limitation of Liability)

  • No Investment Advice: The content on definomist.com—including articles, trend analysis, news, and reports related to decentralized finance (DeFi), cryptocurrency, and other financial topics—is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any assets, securities, or products.
  • Your Own Risk: Digital assets, including cryptocurrencies and DeFi instruments, are highly volatile and inherently risky. You should conduct your own research (DYOR) and due diligence, and consult a qualified professional before making any investment decisions. Any reliance you place on the information from this website is strictly at your own risk.
  • Professional Consultation Required: We are not licensed financial advisors, attorneys, or tax professionals. Always seek the advice of a qualified legal, tax, or financial professional for any specific questions regarding your personal situation.
  • Accuracy of Information: While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, or completeness of any information on the site.

2. Intellectual Property

The Service and its original content (excluding content provided by users), features, and functionality are and will remain the exclusive property of Definomist and its licensors. The Service is protected by copyright, trademark, and other laws of both the country of operation and foreign countries. Our trademarks and trade dress may not be used in connection with any product or service without the prior written consent of Definomist.

3. User Conduct and Prohibitions

As a condition of your use of the Service, you agree not to use the Service for any purpose that is unlawful or prohibited by these Terms. You are prohibited from:

  • Violating any applicable local, national, or international law or regulation.
  • Infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others.
  • Harassing, abusing, or harming other users.
  • Attempting to gain unauthorized access to the Service's systems or networks.
  • Using the Service to transmit any unsolicited advertising or promotional materials ("spam").

4. Links To Other Web Sites

Our Service may contain links to third-party web sites or services that are not owned or controlled by Definomist.

Definomist has no control over, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third-party web sites or services. You further acknowledge and agree that Definomist shall not be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with use of or reliance on any such content, goods or services available on or through any such web sites or services.

We strongly advise you to read the terms and conditions and privacy policies of any third-party web sites or services that you visit.

5. Termination

We may terminate or suspend access to our Service immediately, without prior notice or liability, for any reason whatsoever, including without limitation if you breach the Terms.

All provisions of the Terms which by their nature should survive termination shall survive termination, including, without limitation, ownership provisions, warranty disclaimers, indemnity, and limitations of liability.

6. Limitation Of Liability

In no event shall Definomist, nor its directors, employees, partners, agents, suppliers, or affiliates, be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, including without limitation, loss of profits, data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting from (i) your access to or use of or inability to access or use the Service; (ii) any conduct or content of any third party on the Service; (iii) any content obtained from the Service; and (iv) unauthorized access, use or alteration of your transmissions or content, whether based on warranty, contract, tort (including negligence) or any other legal theory, whether or not we have been informed of the possibility of such damage.

7. Governing Law

These Terms shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of [Insert Jurisdiction Here, e.g., Turkey or the State where the company is legally registered], without regard to its conflict of law provisions.

8. Changes

We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to modify or replace these Terms at any time. If a revision is material, we will try to provide at least 30 days' notice prior to any new terms taking effect. What constitutes a material change will be determined at our sole discretion.

By continuing to access or use our Service after those revisions become effective, you agree to be bound by the revised terms. If you do not agree to the new terms, please stop using the Service.

9. Contact Information

If you have any questions about these Terms, please contact us:

  • By email: info@definomist.com
Svetlana Standards are key. We should also consider regulatory compliance. Rollups make it easier to audit the base layer, but si... on Layer Two Security Models Compared Rollu... Oct 30, 2025 |
Ivan What about the liquidity pool depth? If the liquidation engine pulls a large amount of collateral, it can dump the marke... on The Essentials of DeFi Mechanics: Collat... Oct 29, 2025 |
Ethan Rollup‑to‑rollup bridges could solve most problems. We just need better cross‑chain messaging standards. The article did... on Layer Two Security Models Compared Rollu... Oct 28, 2025 |
Caesar In theory, the community should vote on any change, but in practice the core team pushes updates. That’s why I advocate... on The Essentials of DeFi Mechanics: Collat... Oct 28, 2025 |
Elena Great discussion. I'd add that community audits and formal verification should be mandatory. Let's keep our protocols sa... on Protecting Decentralized Finance From Lo... Oct 28, 2025 |
Charlie The article is missing a section on governance. Who decides the ratio? It feels like we’re trusting the devs without a t... on The Essentials of DeFi Mechanics: Collat... Oct 27, 2025 |
Marco Nina, you keep talking about external calls but that only matters when you have a malicious contract. The loop attack wo... on Protecting Decentralized Finance From Lo... Oct 26, 2025 |
Maximus Rollups are the only future. They’re cheaper and safer. Sidechains are a fallback for legacy apps. on Layer Two Security Models Compared Rollu... Oct 25, 2025 |
Ivan Skeptical of the assumption that price feeds are always accurate. The last hack proved that. We need an off‑chain audit... on The Essentials of DeFi Mechanics: Collat... Oct 25, 2025 |
Maria Great article. I'd like to see the authors dive deeper into formal verification methods. It's the next frontier for secu... on Reentrancy Attacks Unveiled Secure Smart... Oct 24, 2025 |
Aurelia I agree with Luca. Models are great for theoretical insight but they miss the reality of network effects. on Financial Mathematics for DeFi Protocols... Oct 24, 2025 |
Ana I appreciate the focus on the human error aspect. Many of us are too comfortable with 'send' and 'call' without seeing t... on Reentrancy Attacks Unveiled Secure Smart... Oct 24, 2025 |
Aurelia I appreciate the historical lens. Lisbon coffee shops are a great backdrop. Still, I feel the piece over‑romanticizes th... on Navigating Advanced DeFi Lending Models... Oct 24, 2025 |
Aurelius Capm su blockchain? Vulget ad veritatem! Risk‑free rate is nonsense when no treasury to hold the dollar. on Unlocking the Power of CAPM in DeFi Inve... Oct 24, 2025 |
Jenna So true, my buddy got bamboozled by a naive contract, he lost a few hundred ETH. Must always enforce reentrancy guard, d... on Reentrancy Attacks Unveiled Secure Smart... Oct 24, 2025 |
Matteo This is a good guide. I do see real opportunities in cross‑chain incentives using DeFi protocols. on Incentive Modeling to Amplify Yield Acro... Oct 24, 2025 |
Lorenzo This article does a good job of illustrating why reentrancy is the bread and butter of many hacks. However, I think the... on Reentrancy Attacks Unveiled Secure Smart... Oct 24, 2025 |
Svetlana The blog’s approach to VaR uses a 95% confidence interval. A lot of DeFi projects use 99% or even 99.9%. Should update. on Mastering Value at Risk for DeFi Portfol... Oct 24, 2025 |
Lucia The article missed a key nuance: rollups’ fraud proofs are still an area of active research. While they provide a strong... on Layer Two Security Models Compared Rollu... Oct 24, 2025 |
Alex I want to point out that a 50% liquidity loss overnight is extreme. Many protocols have built‑in circuit breakers that s... on Building a Resilient Capital Cushion for... Oct 24, 2025 |
Svetlana Standards are key. We should also consider regulatory compliance. Rollups make it easier to audit the base layer, but si... on Layer Two Security Models Compared Rollu... Oct 30, 2025 |
Ivan What about the liquidity pool depth? If the liquidation engine pulls a large amount of collateral, it can dump the marke... on The Essentials of DeFi Mechanics: Collat... Oct 29, 2025 |
Ethan Rollup‑to‑rollup bridges could solve most problems. We just need better cross‑chain messaging standards. The article did... on Layer Two Security Models Compared Rollu... Oct 28, 2025 |
Caesar In theory, the community should vote on any change, but in practice the core team pushes updates. That’s why I advocate... on The Essentials of DeFi Mechanics: Collat... Oct 28, 2025 |
Elena Great discussion. I'd add that community audits and formal verification should be mandatory. Let's keep our protocols sa... on Protecting Decentralized Finance From Lo... Oct 28, 2025 |
Charlie The article is missing a section on governance. Who decides the ratio? It feels like we’re trusting the devs without a t... on The Essentials of DeFi Mechanics: Collat... Oct 27, 2025 |
Marco Nina, you keep talking about external calls but that only matters when you have a malicious contract. The loop attack wo... on Protecting Decentralized Finance From Lo... Oct 26, 2025 |
Maximus Rollups are the only future. They’re cheaper and safer. Sidechains are a fallback for legacy apps. on Layer Two Security Models Compared Rollu... Oct 25, 2025 |
Ivan Skeptical of the assumption that price feeds are always accurate. The last hack proved that. We need an off‑chain audit... on The Essentials of DeFi Mechanics: Collat... Oct 25, 2025 |
Maria Great article. I'd like to see the authors dive deeper into formal verification methods. It's the next frontier for secu... on Reentrancy Attacks Unveiled Secure Smart... Oct 24, 2025 |
Aurelia I agree with Luca. Models are great for theoretical insight but they miss the reality of network effects. on Financial Mathematics for DeFi Protocols... Oct 24, 2025 |
Ana I appreciate the focus on the human error aspect. Many of us are too comfortable with 'send' and 'call' without seeing t... on Reentrancy Attacks Unveiled Secure Smart... Oct 24, 2025 |
Aurelia I appreciate the historical lens. Lisbon coffee shops are a great backdrop. Still, I feel the piece over‑romanticizes th... on Navigating Advanced DeFi Lending Models... Oct 24, 2025 |
Aurelius Capm su blockchain? Vulget ad veritatem! Risk‑free rate is nonsense when no treasury to hold the dollar. on Unlocking the Power of CAPM in DeFi Inve... Oct 24, 2025 |
Jenna So true, my buddy got bamboozled by a naive contract, he lost a few hundred ETH. Must always enforce reentrancy guard, d... on Reentrancy Attacks Unveiled Secure Smart... Oct 24, 2025 |
Matteo This is a good guide. I do see real opportunities in cross‑chain incentives using DeFi protocols. on Incentive Modeling to Amplify Yield Acro... Oct 24, 2025 |
Lorenzo This article does a good job of illustrating why reentrancy is the bread and butter of many hacks. However, I think the... on Reentrancy Attacks Unveiled Secure Smart... Oct 24, 2025 |
Svetlana The blog’s approach to VaR uses a 95% confidence interval. A lot of DeFi projects use 99% or even 99.9%. Should update. on Mastering Value at Risk for DeFi Portfol... Oct 24, 2025 |
Lucia The article missed a key nuance: rollups’ fraud proofs are still an area of active research. While they provide a strong... on Layer Two Security Models Compared Rollu... Oct 24, 2025 |
Alex I want to point out that a 50% liquidity loss overnight is extreme. Many protocols have built‑in circuit breakers that s... on Building a Resilient Capital Cushion for... Oct 24, 2025 |